Picture this – you’re in a meeting with a client and they start shouting at you about a ‘mistake’ in your work, when it’s actually because they gave you the wrong information to work with. But you grin and bear it because it’s not expected of you to argue with a client.
Or perhaps you’re having a conversation with your boss and he starts complaining about his wife – how are you meant to react here? So you just nod and smile and make agreeable noises at acceptable intervals.
Have you ever had a male colleague complain about another colleague and asked you to ‘handle the situation’ so you have to try and be a mediator? And if you are in a public-facing role, dealing with customers means having to keep your cool and provide exceptional service even when they’re being rude.
These are just a few examples of what is known as ’emotional labour’ in the workplace. Grace Loh, psychotherapist, counsellor and coach at Counselling Perspective, tell us that this term can be defined as the effort, planning and control required to express the most needed emotions during interpersonal communications.
“In the context of the workplace, emotional labour is the expectation that an employee should manipulate one’s actual emotions or the appearance of emotions to satisfy the perceived requirements of the role. This encompasses feigning, repressing, amplifying or modifying one’s emotions,” she elaborates.
The term ’emotional labour’ was coined by sociologist Arlie Hochschild in 1983 and this maintenance of emotional composure or modulation of emotions differs from what one really feels inside.
“Emotions are either expected to be evoked or suppressed,” Grace explains. “Despite emotional labour being an obligatory requirement for numerous professions, women are inordinately burdened to bear emotional labour in the workplace with the expectations to willingly undertake menial tasks, be pleasing and obliging and be responsible for maintaining harmony in the workplace.”
- Not be overly opinionated, domineering or forceful
- Suppress any negative emotions and perpetually be pleasant, polite and positive whilst at work and facing clients
- Expected to be emotional caretakers and place the emotional well-being of others above their own
- Implicitly expected to behave as emotional regulators and therapists, maintaining the peace during conflict and to be emotionally available, receptive and empathetic to bosses and/or colleagues who vent to them
- Allocated undervalued and unpaid activities such as getting the coffee rounds, organising birthday cards and gifts, group events, note-taking at meetings and other administrative tasks or logistics not within their scope of work
- Put up with derogatory or inappropriate comments and jokes made by bosses or clients
Julie, 37, remembers how her boss in a previous job often used her as the go-between when the big boss wanted to have a word with him. “He didn’t like dealing with her as she could be rather long-winded so he often sent me for meetings instead and I had to lie that he wasn’t available,” says the branding manager.
“He often commented that her conversations are so convoluted as if I would somehow be in a better position to understand her because I’m a woman. But it was hard to say no to my boss so I went along with it.”
Unfortunately, women are more prone to having to deal with emotional labour than men. Grace says that it’s more expected of women because of the traditional gender division of labour whereby women have conventionally been designated the roles of caring and nurturance in the private sphere of the home, while men have been involved in rational production. And this division of labour between genders “has contributed to profound gendered implications, compounded by the dominance of societal assumptions that emotions are the ‘natural’ domain of women”.
Also, gendered assumptions about the ‘natural’ capacities of women to deliver service influence how managerial authority directs emotional labour in the workplace.
“Emotional labour is perceived as a ‘woman’s work’, whereby nurturing and caring for others is viewed as befitting for women as if by law of nature based on their gender difference from men,” says Grace.
Another reason for women being more exposed to emotional labour is because it’s a gendered ‘cultural performance’ that is conducted as repeated acts, which conform to what constitutes normal and expected of the female identity.
“In relation to the act of service, we are used to the constructed deferential behaviours and scripts of what constitutes good service, and most often this is from a woman,” Grace explains. “Through the constraints and direction of managerial mandate in the workplace, there still exists hegemonic gender regulation, despite contemporary times. And this influences how women are expected to behave when performing a service at work.”
Because we have to deal with it more, it’s not surprising to know that it takes its toll on us too. Grace says that emotional labour is “viewed as a taxing stressor and depletes women’s personal resources”.
“Academic research has demonstrated that, in addition to the initial stressor that is responsible for the employee performing emotional labour, the taxing effect of emotional labour as a coping mechanism in response to the initial stressor, even as a positive display of emotion, can deplete employees’ emotive and cognitive resources,” she explains.
The toil on women and the costs of emotional labour on organisations can be snowballing. For example, the effort taken to maintain one’s professional game face can negatively impact productivity, as employees who perform emotional labour for prolonged time periods make more errors and take more time for task completion.
“The discordance between how an employee truly feels – for example, feeling distressed – and the expectation to stay unflappable and accommodating with a smile requires exceptional psychological, mental and emotional resources,” Grace reveals. “If exhausted over time, it can result in employee burnout and turnover, and poor mental and physical health outcomes.”
This could impact women’s careers too. This is because women are held back from performing at their best as their internal resources are being utilised by emotional labour, instead of attending to the actual work that can enable them to flourish.
In any work situation, Grace advises women to learn to be aware of when emotional labour is positive and required and when it is not. Clear boundaries can be drawn to allow focus on true priorities.
“For any situation, it is good to ask oneself if it is absolutely necessary to employ one’s resources for emotional labour or if your mental energy is better placed elsewhere,” she says. “It is also good to learn to be self-aware of when you require respite to recuperate and replenish mentally and emotionally. Make it a priority to connect with people or things that you truly enjoy.”
Text: Balvinder Sandhu/HerWorld
- TAGS:
- emotional labour
- workplace